SHA-3 vs the world @ OWASP London posted November 2017
I just gave a talk at OWASP London on SHA-3 and derived functions + derived protocols.
It was apparently the first crypto talk in 5 years so I'm glad I revived this part of OWASP =)
Well done! You've reached the end of my post. Now you can leave a comment or read something else.
Here are some random popular articles:
Here are some random recent articles:
- - Two And A Half Coins: Exploring Layer 2 Solutions on Bitcoin with Kevin Hurley and Alex Akselrod
- - Zero-knowledge proofs in stateful applications
- - Don't go in debt, and other mistakes not to make when receiving stocks or crypto tokens as payment
- - The ZK update conflict issue in multi-user applications
- - What's happening in the round 5 of PlonK?
- - I talked about ZK security on the first episode of Node Guardians season 2!
- - zkVMs are cool, but have you heard of zkCPUs?
Comments
fdsafd
ffffffffffffffffffffffff yes
dafdfdsfds
Sc00bz
Three minor things:
33:10: Parallel vs sequential for passwords. Parallel is better because it is faster. Note more work in less time is better.
44:27: Stream cipher, not one time pad.
50:31: Skylake doesn't have SHA instructions. So those are max speeds (Assumes code is optimized). Note ARM has SHA1 and SHA256 since forever (Now even Raspberry Pi has it: 2 v1.2, 3, 3+). If you ran SHA256 like K12, "Kangaroo-SHA256 " would be faster.
leave a comment...