SHA-3 vs the world @ OWASP London posted November 2017
I just gave a talk at OWASP London on SHA-3 and derived functions + derived protocols.
It was apparently the first crypto talk in 5 years so I'm glad I revived this part of OWASP =)
Well done! You've reached the end of my post. Now you can leave a comment or read something else.
Here are some random popular articles:
Here are some random recent articles:
- - A journey into zero-knowledge proofs
- - Simple introduction to monads in OCaml
- - What's out there for ECDSA threshold signatures
- - Contributing to open source projects and about learning zero-knowledge proofs
- - A journey into zero-knowledge proofs
- - Cairo's public memory
- - The intuition behind the sum-check protocol in 5 minutes
Comments
fdsafd
ffffffffffffffffffffffff yes
dafdfdsfds
Sc00bz
Three minor things:
33:10: Parallel vs sequential for passwords. Parallel is better because it is faster. Note more work in less time is better.
44:27: Stream cipher, not one time pad.
50:31: Skylake doesn't have SHA instructions. So those are max speeds (Assumes code is optimized). Note ARM has SHA1 and SHA256 since forever (Now even Raspberry Pi has it: 2 v1.2, 3, 3+). If you ran SHA256 like K12, "Kangaroo-SHA256 " would be faster.
leave a comment...